Psst - Hey - I Am Not Mentioning Any Names, But Joel Is A Troublemaker

For those who don't get the significance of how big public education is out of control, you must openly understand the significance of what is playing out on the "I Am Troublemaker Blog". You must move past the knee jerk reaction that is apparent from the outcry that has risen, and understand the vapidity of the arguments against his actions. Those who are arguing against him may have a valid reason and Mr. Chandler is on the record as recognizing those reasons, but it is fruitless to bark up a tree where there is no varmint.

I was drawn to this sequence of events because I am familiar with how the public school system abuses it's power and authority. At first glance, this was just another incident where the public school system simply ignores a nuisance on a whim.


After you read my comments below, check out this post:

A letter from Gail....

At first I was curious as to what happened to the rest of the letter. Having read enough of Mr. Chandler's writings, I assumed that there was no need for us to read the rest of the letter. Therefore, the message was already there.

I think I got it. It's like a school yard game where some kid says "I'm not mentioning any names, but Joel is a troublemaker".

Ms. McKinzie wrote a letter to "all school board employees" that clearly outlines that the Court agreed and entered a second Order that," ...... directed that Mr. Chander's name should not be used in internal communications from PCSB to its employees made under its exemption determination procedures".


If you note the date of the letter and then compare that date to the e-mail from a school employee found here:Norma’s Caper, one could easily assume that the employee e-mail was triggered by the Superintendent's letter.

If you read and paid attention to the Superintendent's letter, you can see where she actually made reference to the fact that the reason Mr. Chandler was requesting that his name not be associated with any direct communication is because the burden of determining exemptions is regulated by statute and not by the Court system.

For those who are having trouble with the significance with that statement, I would strongly point out at this point that the the burden of determining exemptions along with the system's legal responsibility to address legal public records requests are not based on Mr. Chandler's public records request. But, all of a sudden it sure appears that way.


I write frequently on my other blogs about the arrogance with ignorance within the public school system. This just may be another example. Time will tell.